Frankensteinの配信情報・視聴方法・感想

MOST VIEWED

アクセスランキング

直近7日間
  1. 1
    ウォーターワールド15 views
  2. 2
    踊る大捜査線13 views
  3. 3
    エニグマ12 views
  4. 4
    ディストラクション・ベイビーズ12 views
  5. 5
    Blood+11 views
Frankenstein

Frankenstein

Frankenstein

5.8
★★★★★TMDB評価 44件

日本語のあらすじはまだ登録されていません。

HORROR TAGS

この作品のホラータグ

🌎洋ホラー

WHERE TO WATCH

このシリーズを観られるサービス

配信情報提供 JustWatch

日本国内の配信情報は現在登録されていません。

※ 配信状況や料金は変更される場合があります。リンク先で最新情報をご確認ください。

YOUR REACTION

この作品、どうだった?

ゾクログユーザーのリアクション

怖さのタイプ

みんなの一言

まだコメントはありません。最初の一言を投稿しませんか?

一言コメントを投稿

投稿は編集部の確認後に公開されます。

OFFICIAL TRAILER

予告編

動画提供: YouTube / Hallmark Frankenstein Trailer

シリーズ紹介

作品情報を準備中です。

制作

出演者

AUDIENCE REVIEWS

TMDBユーザーの口コミ

原文のまま掲載
W
Wuchak2019-12-15
***The most faithful version of Mary Shelley’s classic gothic horror novel*** A Hallmark production, "Frankenstein" (2004) is the most literary faithful filmic version of the oft-done tragedy. Luke Goss looks more lik…

***The most faithful version of Mary Shelley’s classic gothic horror novel***

A Hallmark production, "Frankenstein" (2004) is the most literary faithful filmic version of the oft-done tragedy. Luke Goss looks more like the novel’s depiction of the creature (with long black hair and white teeth) than Boris Karloff in the Universal classics or Robert De Niro in the 1994 version, but he’s also too handsome in a dark gothic way, resembling Type O Negative’s Peter Steele. The creature in the 1994 version didn’t have hair and was a more gruesome depiction, which fits Victor’s description of the creature in the book as “hideous” (then, again, Victor was extremely biased against his creation).

While this rendition and the 1994 one are the most faithful to Shelley’s book, they each omit parts and change certain things. For instance, both omit Victor’s traveling to Scotland and, later, Ireland, which was a good call. Actually, I think both versions improve the story in different ways. When Victor and the creature finally meet and have a discussion in the high country, this one has them meet at a ruined castle, which is an excellent deviation. The 1994 version has them talk at a remote glacial dwelling, which is closer to what occurs in the novel.

My favorite part is when the monster finds sanctuary with the rural family, unbeknownst to them. It helps the viewer get to know the creature and have compassion on his plight. In the book and the 1994 version all sympathy is pretty much lost eventually while this rendition paints the creature more sympathetically. The locket sequence is lame though, but that was a weak point of the novel as well.

Alec Newman is intense and brooding as Victor Frankenstein and I could relate to his work obsessions carried out in his nightgown (or whatever). Any problems with the flick are due to translating a convoluted 19th century gothic horror classic to modern cinema.

With almost an hour more to play with compared to the 1994 version, this one has the luxury of taking its time and is the better for it IMHO. The 1994 movie, by contrast, is overly manic and melodramatic because it tried to cram too much into two hours.

The film runs 2 hours, 56 minutes, and was shot in Slovakia and Norway.

GRADE: B+

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

この作品を見ている人はこんなものも見ています