作品紹介
ソ連出身の名匠アンドレイ・タルコフスキーが、ポーランドの作家スタニスワフ・レムの代表作「ソラリスの陽のもとに」を映画化したSF。未知の生命体と接触し、極限状態に置かれた人間の心理を独特の映像表現で描き、1972年・第25回カンヌ国際映画祭で審査員特別賞を受賞した。 海と雲に覆われ、生物の存在が確認されていない惑星ソラリス。科学者たちはその海に理性があると考え、接触を図るが失敗に終わる。宇宙ステーション「プロメテウス」は謎の混乱に陥り、地球との通信も途絶えてしまう。心理学者クリスが原因究明のため送り込まれるが、友人の物理学者はすでに自殺しており、残る2人の科学者も怯えきっていた。知性を持つ有機体である海が及ぼす、不可解な現象の数々。やがてクリスの前に、数年前に自殺した妻が姿を現す。
監督
出演者
プロフィールを見る →
プロフィールを見る →
プロフィールを見る →
プロフィールを見る →
プロフィールを見る →AUDIENCE REVIEWS
TMDBユーザーの口コミ
Acclaimed psychologist "Kelvin" (Donates Banionis) is despatched to a space station to investigate the mysterious death of one of the three remaining scientists who are working on the surface of a remote moon. Upon arriv…
Acclaimed psychologist "Kelvin" (Donates Banionis) is despatched to a space station to investigate the mysterious death of one of the three remaining scientists who are working on the surface of a remote moon. Upon arrival he discovers that there are now just the two of the original eighty-plus crew left aboard the rather ramshackle facility. "Snaut" (Jüri Järvet) and "Sartorius" (Anatoliy Solonitsyn). Their welcome is, to put it mildly, bizarre and before long he starts to dream. His apparitions become more vivid, more realistic, and they feature his deceased wife "Khari" (Natalya Bondarenchuk). Are these just hallucinations or are they more. Might they be real? Might they exist in an alternate reality? Is it something in the water? Andrei Tarkovsky uses his dialogue sparingly as he tautly directs this mystery. We are drip fed information - sometimes contradictory, sometimes speculative - just as "Kelvin" receives it - and we are left in the same quandary as he finds himself in. It's a sort of groundhog day scenario that plays out time and time again - but he cannot decide if he wants to break it, amend it or sustain it, and his colleagues are little help as they have long suffered from the same symptoms. I won't lie - it can be slow progress at times. It's not always helped by the rather soporific Artemyev score, and the pace is a little wobbly as we get to grips with the scenario, but once there this is a considered look at just how the human mind may/can/will work when tested and it's well illustrative of the fact that there is way more out there that we don't understand than we do. It does benefit from a big screen, if only to add a scope to the broadness of the production and the concept.
口コミはTMDBユーザーによる投稿です。ゾクログの見解を示すものではありません。
















みんなの一言
まだコメントはありません。最初の一言を投稿しませんか?