リチャード三世の配信情報・視聴方法・感想

MOST VIEWED

アクセスランキング

直近7日間
  1. 1
    ウォーターワールド14 views
  2. 2
    踊る大捜査線13 views
  3. 3
    エニグマ12 views
  4. 4
    Blood+11 views
  5. 5
    北極星11 views
カテゴリー
リチャード三世
1995

リチャード三世

Richard III

6.8
★★★★★TMDB評価 198件

いつも悪態をついて国王一族の反感を買っているリチャード三世。王位継承を目論む彼は、兄を殺害するなど邪魔者の排除を開始したが……。英国皇室の残忍な陰謀劇を描いた歴史スペクタクル。

出演
イアン・マッケラン、アネット・ベニング、ジム・ブロードベント、ロバート・ダウニー・Jr.、クリスティン・スコット・トーマス
ジャンル
ドラマ / 戦争
上映時間
104分

HORROR TAGS

この作品のホラータグ

🌎洋ホラー

WHERE TO WATCH

この作品を観られるサービス

配信情報提供 JustWatch

日本国内の配信情報は現在登録されていません。

※ 配信状況や料金は変更される場合があります。リンク先で最新情報をご確認ください。

YOUR REACTION

この作品、どうだった?

ゾクログユーザーのリアクション

怖さのタイプ

みんなの一言

まだコメントはありません。最初の一言を投稿しませんか?

一言コメントを投稿

投稿は編集部の確認後に公開されます。

OFFICIAL TRAILER

予告編

動画提供: YouTube / Richard III (1995) ORIGINAL TRAILER [HD 1080p]

作品紹介

いつも悪態をついて国王一族の反感を買っているリチャード三世。王位継承を目論む彼は、兄を殺害するなど邪魔者の排除を開始したが……。英国皇室の残忍な陰謀劇を描いた歴史スペクタクル。

監督

出演者

AUDIENCE REVIEWS

TMDBユーザーの口コミ

原文のまま掲載
T
tmdb280390232022-08-27 · EN
★ 4.0
Co-writers Ian McKellen and Richard Loncraine (who also directs) set their Richard III in 1930s Britain, and make the infamous hunchback a fascist warmonger plotting to usurp the throne. Today's English monarchy is, at b…

Co-writers Ian McKellen and Richard Loncraine (who also directs) set their Richard III in 1930s Britain, and make the infamous hunchback a fascist warmonger plotting to usurp the throne. Today's English monarchy is, at best, nominal, but even way back in the 1930s there wasn't much to be gained by usurping it.

Then again, the film takes place in an alternate reality where the War of the Roses occurs 450 years after the true historical conflict did. I don’t mind so much that royalty has endured those four centuries and a half; what does bother me is that language has not evolved in the interim at the same rate as, say, warfare. Why on Earth would Richard (McKellen), who is neither dumb nor crazy, use the expression “my kingdom for a horse” when he could be asking for a tank instead?

This line is only in the movie because it’s in the play – but then, a great many things that are in the play aren’t in the film, and viceversa, so why keep this particular bit? I mean, it couldn’t be because the audience is expecting it, even though it makes zero sense given the circumstances, could it? Did they think diehard Shakespeare fans would riot otherwise? Well, if there were such a thing as hardcore Shake-heads, I assure you they would have rioted long before this point.

Similarly outdated is a scene in which several characters who have been at each other’s throats are compelled to swear mutual oaths of loyalty. As Al Pacino’s superb documentary Looking for Richard rightly points out, at the time that the original play is set this would be serious business, because only people who want to go to hell would swear an oath and not keep it. Ditto the scene where Richard blames his deformity on Queen Elizabeth's witchcraft; this is an accusation that would have been given credence in the 1470s, but not so much in the 1930s.

All things considered, it’s somewhat ironic that McKellen had a hand in the script, because his performance is worthy of much better material. His body language, in particular, is priceless – this Richard looks like a super-intelligent ape masquerading as a British Army field marshal. And when he breaks the fourth wall – another device that works better on a theater stage –, it feels as if Richard is letting the viewers in on that the entire movie is a sick joke he's playing on the other characters. If only.

TMDBで口コミを見る ↗

口コミはTMDBユーザーによる投稿です。ゾクログの見解を示すものではありません。

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

この作品を見ている人はこんなものも見ています